Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PK 10/11 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to failure to specify legal claim type in civil complaint under Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number I PK 10/11
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the lower courts failed to determine the specific legal nature of the plaintiff's request. The plaintiff sought a 'correction' of a negative academic performance evaluation, but the complaint did not clearly specify whether this constituted a claim for performance, determination, or formation of a legal status. The court ruled that without a precise definition of the desired legal protection, the essence of the case cannot be adjudicated, necessitating a remand for clarification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 187 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 468 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: A civil claim must be precisely formulated regarding the type of legal protection sought; failure to specify whether the claim is for performance, determination, or formation prevents the court from recognizing the essence of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code unclear claim formulation legal protection type remand for clarification academic evaluation dispute essence of case plaintiff obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 187 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 468 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 189 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 187 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 468 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 112 § 3 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PR 389/65
I PK 177/09
Supreme Court allows correction of defendant's name in labor dispute when plaintiff intended to sue the actual employer.
II PK 99/10
Supreme Court quashes labor court judgment for improper defendant designation and remands case to lower court.
I PK 312/06
I PK 14/08
I PK 294/02
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling academic evaluation criteria extend beyond teaching hours to include research and organizational duties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text