Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 16/09 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; procedural order in telecom regulation is not separately appealable but subject to judicial review.

Case Number III SK 16/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a telecommunications company against a procedural order issued by the President of the Office of Electronic Communications. The appellant argued that the order, confirming the lack of effective competition and significant market position, violated constitutional rights by being unappealable. The court held that while the order cannot be challenged separately, it is not a final decision on rights and is reviewed during the appeal against the main regulatory decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 206 ust. 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego; Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP: A procedural order confirming market conditions in telecom regulation is not separately appealable but remains subject to judicial review within the appeal against the final regulatory decision.

Keywords

AI generated
telecommunications regulation procedural order appeal significant market position effective competition judicial review scope Office of Electronic Communications constitutional rights protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 206 ust. 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 78 Konstytucji RP
Art. 24 ust. 1 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
Art. 25 ust. 2 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 88 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 6 k.p
art. 47961 § 2 k.p.c
art. 78 Konstytucji RP

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text