Social security court must rule on pension fund liability for missing facts under Art. 118 ust. 1a. The court ruled that the pension fund is liable for not establishing a crucial fact. The Supreme Court held that the court must rule on the pension fund's liability for not establishing the last necessary circumstance for issuing the decision. The court ruled that the pension fund is liable for not establishing a crucial fact. The Supreme Court held that the court must rule on the pension fund's liability for not establishing the last necessary circumstance for issuing the decision. The court ruled that the pension fund is liable for not establishing a crucial fact. The Supreme Court held that the court must rule on the pension fund's liability for not establishing the last necessary circumstance for issuing the decision.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a court must rule on the pension fund's liability for failing to establish a crucial fact. The lower court had granted social security benefits and held the pension fund liable for this omission, despite the appeal not explicitly challenging this specific point. The Supreme Court determined that Article 118, Section 1a of the Social Security Pensions Act mandates the court to address such liability even if it was not the subject of the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 118 ust. 1a ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 321 § 1 k.p.c.; The court must rule on the pension fund's liability for failing to establish a crucial fact for issuing a decision, as this provision is a special procedural rule requiring the judgment to cover matters beyond the appeal's scope.