Supreme Court allows workers' claim that rest rights constitute a separate personal good distinct from health.

The Supreme Court partially allowed the cassation appeal by overturning the lower court's dismissal of the claim regarding rest rights. The plaintiffs, medical staff, argued that their right to uninterrupted rest was violated, causing significant mental distress and health risks. The court held that the right to rest is a distinct personal good requiring compensation, though it noted the plaintiffs' own financial motivations for working shifts mitigated the severity of the violation.