Supreme Court held that submitting data matching one of two valid parallel activity classifications is not false data under social insurance law.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a decision increasing the employer's accident insurance contribution rate by 50%. The employer argued that using the 2007 activity classification instead of the 2004 version did not constitute providing false data under Article 34 of the Social Insurance Act. The court ruled that since both classifications were legally valid and current, submitting data consistent with one of them could not be deemed false, thereby preventing the automatic penalty.