III SK 51/10 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; regulatory duties do not exempt proving lack of anti-competitive practices.

Case Number III SK 51/10

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2011-06-08

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a telecommunications company against the President of the Electronic Communications Office. The company argued procedural errors regarding the scope of the appeal and the handling of a prior agreement with the Competition Authority. The court ruled that regulatory obligations do not exempt the enterprise from proving it has not engaged in anti-competitive practices and that the lower courts correctly identified the proper two-instance judicial review procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 25 ust. 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego; Art. 206 ust. 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego: Regulatory duties imposed on a dominant enterprise do not exempt the enterprise from demonstrating the absence of anti-competitive practices, and the exclusive remedy for challenging such decisions is the two-instance judicial procedure.

Keywords

AI generated

telecommunications regulation dominant position anti-competitive practices cassation appeal procedural review regulatory duties judicial remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 25 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 16 lipca 2004 r. - Prawo telekomunikacyjne

art. 206 ust. 2 i ust. 4 w związku z art. 24 ust. 1 oraz art. 25 ust. 2 i 4 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego

art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

art. 106 § 1 k.p

art. 106 k.p

art. 7 Konstytucji RP

art. 6 k.p

art. 244 § 1 k.p.c

art. 245 k.p.c

art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Cassation appeal dismissed; regulatory duties do not exempt proving lack of anti-competitive practices.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text