Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 308/10 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax officer liability for company debts and bankruptcy filing timing.

Case Number II UK 308/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by former company managers against a tax authority decision holding them jointly liable for social security arrears. The court found that the company's permanent cessation of debt payments and insufficient assets independently justified a bankruptcy filing, regardless of a failed settlement agreement. Consequently, the managers could not avoid liability by claiming they filed for bankruptcy too late or that the company's assets were sufficient.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 116 § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej; Art. 1 § 1 Prawa upadłościowego: A member of the management board is liable for tax debts, and the grounds for bankruptcy filing are independent, meaning permanent cessation of payments alone justifies the filing without needing to prove asset insufficiency.

Keywords

AI generated
tax officer liability bankruptcy filing timing social security arrears joint and several liability settlement agreement effect permanent cessation of payments Supreme Court appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 116 § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej
art. 1 § 1 Prawa upadłościowego
art. 2 Prawa upadłościowego
art. 1 § 2 Prawa upadłościowego
art. 383 § 1 k.h.
art. 6 k.c
art. 3 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 1 k.p.c
art. 217 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UK 341/07
Former board member as liquidator held personally liable for social security contributions due to ineffective company execution.
III UK 14/09
Social security contributions liability remains valid after bankruptcy liquidation and company deregistration. The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal. The court ruled that the concept of ineffective execution includes unpaid contributions in bankruptcy proceedings ending with company liquidation. The court held that since bankruptcy proceedings ended with asset distribution and deregistration, execution of unpaid contributions would have been effective. The court dismissed the appeal because the bankruptcy proceedings verified the insufficiency of assets to cover social security contributions. The court found that general clauses of the Civil Code do not apply to social security and tax liability matters. The court rejected constitutional and procedural complaints as they lacked impact on the case outcome. The court dismissed the appeal based on Article 39814 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court awarded costs to the defendant based on Article 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court determined that the concept of ineffective execution covers unpaid contributions in bankruptcy proceedings ending with company liquidation. The court held that execution of unpaid contributions would have been effective before the decision on liability. The court dismissed the appeal because the bankruptcy proceedings verified the insufficiency of assets to cover social security contributions. The court found that general clauses of the Civil Code do not apply to social security and tax liability matters. The court rejected constitutional and procedural complaints as they lacked impact on the case outcome. The court dismissed the appeal based on Article 39814 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court awarded costs to the defendant based on Article 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
II UK 258/09
Social security contributions arrears after settlement agreement do not exempt management from bankruptcy liability.
II UK 131/10
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; social security contributions remain payable despite failed bankruptcy settlement.
I UK 278/10
Supreme Court dismisses liability exemption claim for association board members regarding post-settlement social insurance arrears.
V CK 533/03

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text