II PK 181/10
AI generated
Criminal record check refusal damages claim allowed; appeal costs ruling inadmissible to Supreme Court.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the employer's refusal to hire the plaintiff due to a missing criminal record declaration. The court held that such a refusal constitutes a violation of equal treatment principles, allowing the claim for damages. However, the appeal regarding the appellate court's ruling on first-instance costs was declared inadmissible because the Supreme Court can only review costs decisions made in the final appeal judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 6 pkt 10 ustawy o Krajowym Rejestrze Karnym; Art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal against a second-instance court's decision on first-instance costs is inadmissible as it does not constitute a new cost ruling by the first instance.
Keywords
AI generated
equal treatment violation
criminal record check
employment discrimination
cassation appeal dismissal
costs of proceedings
inadmissible appeal
reformatory judgment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 6 pkt 10 ustawy z dnia 24 maja 2000 r. o Krajowym Rejestrze Karnym
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 221 § 1 k.p
art. 3 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienia Sądu Najwyższy z dnia 23 czerwca 2010 r., II CZ 45/10
postanowienia Sądu Najwyższy z dnia 24 września 2010 r., IV CZ 60/10
I PK 212/08
Supreme Court corrects school director appointment date based on statutory six-month vacancy period rules.