Failure to rule on pension agency liability for missing facts does not bar interest claims.

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether the Social Insurance Agency's failure to rule on its liability for missing facts precludes an insured person from claiming interest. The insured, Leszek W., sought interest on a delayed pension after the Social Insurance Agency denied it, arguing that the agency's omission violated statutory requirements. The Court held that such an omission does not deprive the insured of the right to interest, as the issue requires separate adjudication in subsequent proceedings. Consequently, the insured retains the right to claim interest despite the agency's procedural silence on liability.