Appeal against civil procedure costs ruling in delay complaint proceedings is inadmissible under Polish law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the refusal to supplement a court order with higher legal representation costs. The lower court denied the request because the specific fee schedule for delay complaints did not cover the higher amount claimed, and the Supreme Court agreed that such incidental cost rulings are not subject to appeal in this non-two-instance procedure. Consequently, the appeal was declared inadmissible as it lacked a proper legal basis for review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3941 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 39821 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.: An appeal to the Supreme Court against a court order regarding legal representation costs in proceedings for a complaint against procedural delay is inadmissible because such proceedings do not constitute a two-instance trial.