Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 52/10 AI generated

Railway pensioner retains discounted travel rights after retirement despite lacking 15 years of railway service.

Case Number III PK 52/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the railway worker's claim for discounted travel benefits. The worker argued that transitioning from a disability pension to a retirement pension preserved his rights under the collective agreement, while the employer contended the 15-year service requirement was mandatory. The court ruled that the collective agreement's provision protecting pensioners' rights applies regardless of the 15-year threshold, preventing the loss of benefits solely due to retirement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 86 ust. 1 ponadzakładowego układu zbiorowego pracy; Rencista kolejowy zachowuje prawo do ulgowych świadczeń przejazdowych po przejściu na emeryturę, nawet jeśli nie przepracował 15 lat na kolei.

Keywords

AI generated
railway collective agreement pensioner travel rights retirement transition acquired rights protection fifteen year service rule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 86 ust. 1 ponadzakładowego układu zbiorowego pracy dla pracowników zatrudnionych przez pracodawców zrzeszonych w Związku Pracodawców Kolejowych z dnia 2 grudnia 2002 r.
art. 2 Konstytucji
art. 42 k.p.
art. 40 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z FUS
art. 8 k.p.
art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art.9 § 1 k.p
art. 239 § 2 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text