Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 36/10 AI generated

Supreme Court allows energy company to charge for streetlight maintenance, rejecting anti-competition claims.

Case Number III SK 36/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the lower court's dismissal of an appeal regarding a dominant energy company's pricing practices. The company argued that charging municipalities for streetlight maintenance and repairs did not constitute an anti-competitive practice under the Competition and Consumers Protection Act. The court ruled that such charges are not unjustified benefits because they cover necessary operational costs without violating the Energy Law's mandate for municipalities to fund lighting infrastructure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 pkt 22 Prawa energetycznego; Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 6 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: Charging a municipality for the maintenance and repair of street lighting infrastructure does not constitute an anti-competitive practice if the costs are necessary for service provision and do not yield unjustified double remuneration.

Keywords

AI generated
dominant position abuse street lighting maintenance unjustified benefit energy law interpretation competition protection act municipal funding obligations operational cost recovery

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 pkt 22 Prawa energetycznego
art. 8 ust. 1 i ust. 2 pkt 6 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
art. 4 ust. 1 Prawa energetycznego
art. 140 w związku z art. 353 § 1 k.c.
art. 9 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
art. 353 § 1 k.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok z 16 października 2008 r., III SK 8/08

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text