Supreme Court dismissed MP's social insurance pension claim as he was not an employee during the required period.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Stanisław J.'s cassation appeal regarding his right to a social insurance pension. The applicant, a former European Parliament member, argued that his parliamentary mandate constituted employment for insurance purposes, but the court found he was not insured as an employee during the mandatory 24-month period. Consequently, the court ruled that the specific provisions of the pension law exclude parliamentary mandates from the general employee insurance requirements.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 29 ust. 2 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: The period of serving as a member of the European Parliament does not constitute employment insurance for the purpose of granting a pension under the general employee provisions.