Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 142/10 AI generated

Supreme Court allows rent claim via statute of limitations defense, ruling specific installments expire separately.

Case Number I PK 142/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for compensatory rent, ruling that the statute of limitations applies to specific rent installments individually. Although the general limitation period for periodic payments was not yet expired, the court held that the plaintiff's right to each installment expires separately upon the passage of ten years from the incident. Consequently, the case was remanded for a new decision on the costs of the cassation proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 442 § 1 k.c.; Art. 120 § 1 k.c.; While the general limitation period for periodic claims has not expired, the statute of limitations applies to each specific installment separately, meaning the right to future installments expires upon the passage of ten years from the incident.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations periodic payments compensatory rent occupational disease separate expiration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 442 § 1 k.c.
Art. 120 § 1 k.c.
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 4421 § 1 k.c
art. 118 k.c
art. 442 § 1 k.c
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c
art. 361 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text