Non-compete clause limits only goods/services of employer, not general professional activities.

The Supreme Court partially set aside the lower court's judgment regarding a non-compete clause dispute. The plaintiff argued that the clause prohibited any similar professional activity, while the employer contended it only restricted activities directly related to the employer's specific business. The court ruled that a non-compete ban applies solely to the production of goods or services constituting the employer's business or similar substitutes, not to the general exercise of the learned profession.