Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I UZP 2/10 AI generated

Social security proceedings do not require a separate authorization document for the pension board director's representative.

Case Number I UZP 2/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a social security organ's representative must submit a separate authorization document alongside their power of attorney. The court found that in social security cases, the pension board director acts as the party itself rather than an agent of the state, making the director's signature on the power of attorney sufficient under the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the absence of a separate authorization document does not invalidate the first-instance proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 89 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 460 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 476 § 4 k.p.c.; Art. 47711 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 3 pkt 13 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych: In social security proceedings, a power of attorney signed by the pension board director is sufficient without a separate document proving the director's authority to act.

Keywords

AI generated
social security proceedings pension board director power of attorney authorization document Code of Civil Procedure invalidity of proceedings statutory agency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 89 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 460 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 476 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 47711 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3 pkt 13 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 89 § 1 k.p.c
art. 460 § 1 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 47711 § 1 k.p.c
art. 476 § 4 pkt 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I UK 172/07
II UZ 48/05
Supreme Court allows ZUS President to grant legal power of attorney to non-employee lawyer for cassation appeal.
I UK 24/09
I CSK 304/08
III CZP 74/93
III CZP 14/06
Bankruptcy law ruling: Lawyer's self-certified registry copy suffices for corporate creditor's power of attorney.
III CZP 19/09
Supreme Court dismisses legal question due to invalid power of attorney and procedural defect in lower courts.
III CZP 21/04
Supreme Court rules lawyer can only certify their own power of attorney, not the principal's.
III CZP 118/08
Polish Supreme Court allows curing unauthorized lawyer's acts via client confirmation under Civil Procedure Code.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text