Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 103/10 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling gender-based pension age differences do not constitute sex discrimination.

Case Number II UK 103/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Janusz C. against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal of early retirement. The court found that the applicant failed to meet the statutory requirements for early retirement under the Social Insurance Act. Consequently, the court held that the statutory difference in retirement ages between men and women does not amount to unlawful sex discrimination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 29 ust. 1 pkt 1 i 2, art. 46 ust. 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach; The differentiation in retirement ages between men and women in the Social Insurance Act does not constitute discrimination based on sex.

Keywords

AI generated
social insurance retirement age gender discrimination early retirement constitutional review pension rights sex equality

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 29 ust. 1 pkt 1 i 2, art. 46 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 32 i 33 Konstytucji RP
Art. 398 k.p.c.
art. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text