III KRS 6/10
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal against KRS judge selection, ruling it lacks substantive review power absent legal error.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Urszula M.'s appeal against the National Council of the Judiciary's refusal to nominate her as a judge. The Council rejected her candidacy in favor of Jakub C. due to lower support scores from the Collegium and the General Assembly, citing her work across multiple divisions. The Court held that its role is limited to verifying legal compliance, not re-evaluating the Council's discretionary assessment of qualifications.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 13 ust. 2, 5 ustawy o KRS; The Supreme Court does not verify the substantive correctness of the National Council of the Judiciary's candidate selection unless it stems from a factual error or legal violation.
Keywords
AI generated
National Council of Judiciary
judicial appointment procedure
substantive review power
candidate selection discretion
Supreme Court jurisdiction
judicial appointment
procedural review
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 13 ust. 2 of the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary
Art. 13 ust. 5 of the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary
Act of 27 July 2001 on the National Council of the Judiciary
Presidential Decree of 13 November 2007 on the detailed procedure of the National Council of the Judiciary
art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 186 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP