Election protest dismissed for exceeding scope and lacking evidence of unconstitutional influence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the election protest filed by Zbigniew G. against the validity of the presidential elections. The petitioner argued that the candidate violated the Constitution by holding multiple public offices simultaneously, claiming this created an unconstitutional concentration of power. The court ruled that the protest was inadmissible because it raised constitutional issues unrelated to the specific provisions governing the presidential election process and failed to provide evidence supporting the claim of voter influence.