Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SW 54/10 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses presidential election protest claiming natural disaster victims lacked equal voting chances.

Case Number III SW 54/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Bronisław H.'s protest against the presidential election, ruling that the claim of violated voting equality was unfounded. The petitioner argued that natural disaster victims lacked equal campaign opportunities and access to polling stations, yet the Court found no evidence of specific violations. The decision established that formal and material equality in presidential elections is maintained by standard polling district creation and public notice of campaign spaces.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta RP; art. 22 ust. 1 i art. 78b tej ustawy: The principle of equal voting chances in presidential elections is realized through standard polling district formation and the provision of equal campaign spaces for all committees, without requiring special accommodations for disaster-affected areas.

Keywords

AI generated
presidential election protest voting equality principle natural disaster impact polling district formation campaign space allocation formal and material equality Supreme Court dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 78b ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 72 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 73 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 129 Konstytucji RP
art. 62 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 228 ust. 7 Konstytucji RP
art. 228 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 228 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text