III SW 117/10
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses protest against voting after 20:00, ruling it does not violate election law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Andrzej J.'s election protest regarding the validity of votes cast after 20:00. The petitioner argued that irregular voting certificates and a lack of extended silence orders violated the principle of equal voting rights. The court held that allowing late arrivals to vote does not breach the statute, as it is necessary to ensure all eligible voters can exercise their constitutional right.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 49 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej; Art. 4 Konstytucji RP; The court ruled that permitting voters who arrive shortly before closing to cast ballots after 20:00 does not violate the election law or the principle of equal voting rights.
Keywords
AI generated
election protest dismissal
voting after closing time
principle of equal voting
voting certificate irregularities
extended silence order
constitutional voting rights
election law interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 49 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 4 Konstytucji RP
Art. 62 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 59 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 74 ust. 1 ustawy o wyborach prezydenckich
Art. 75 ust. 1 i ust. 1a ustawy o wyborach prezydenckich
art. 129 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 62 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP