Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 344/09 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses restitutory claim for unenforceable judgment benefits due to lack of material legal basis.

Case Number II PK 344/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a request for restitution of benefits obtained from an unenforceable judgment. The appellant failed to specify the procedural grounds or cite the specific material law provisions required to justify the return of the unenforceable benefit. Consequently, the court ruled that the claim lacked the necessary factual and legal foundation for a restitutory order.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 409 k.c.: A party seeking restitution of benefits from an unenforceable judgment must explicitly cite both the procedural basis and the material legal provisions establishing the right to return, as mere awareness of the judgment's status is insufficient.

Keywords

AI generated
restitutory claim unenforceable judgment material legal basis procedural grounds benefits obtained cassation appeal unspecified grounds

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 409 k.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 61 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 45 § 2 k.p
art. 45 § 3 k.p
art. 199 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text