Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 40/09 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, shifting burden of proof on market definition to the competition authority.

Case Number III SK 40/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a competition authority decision regarding Telekomunikacja Polska's alleged monopoly practices. The court held that the burden of correctly defining the relevant market rests with the competition authority, not the enterprise. Consequently, the court found the lower court's abstract analysis of a conglomerate market insufficient to prove exclusionary conduct without concrete local market evidence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1 w związku z art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; The burden of proving the correct definition of the relevant market lies with the competition authority, and abstract analysis of a conglomerate market is insufficient to establish exclusionary conduct without concrete local market evidence.

Keywords

AI generated
competition law market definition burden of proof dominant position exclusionary conduct telecommunications infrastructure relevant market

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 8 ust. 1 w związku z art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
art. 316 k.p.c
art. 6 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text