Supreme Court rules judges' pension not based on last post if not a regular judge post.

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question regarding whether a judge's pension should be calculated based on their last position as an Ombudsman. The plaintiff, a judge appointed to the Ombudsman role, argued for a higher pension based on that temporary post, while the Court noted the specific statutory provisions governing judges' pensions. The Court ruled that the phrase 'last held position' refers only to regular judge posts, excluding temporary delegations, thereby denying the claim for a pension calculated on the Ombudsman's salary.