Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee transfer did not occur as he was not yet employed by new company.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking compensation for wrongful termination and unpaid vacation. The court found that although the employee managed the transfer of assets, he was not legally employed by the new company until after the transfer occurred. Consequently, the statutory conditions for a transfer of the workplace under Article 231 of the Labor Code were not met. The court ruled that the lower court correctly determined the employment relationship began only after the asset transfer, invalidating the claim for transfer-related compensation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 231 k.p.; A transfer of the workplace requires the employee to be legally employed by the transferring entity at the time of transfer, which was not established in this case as the employment contract was concluded post-transfer.