Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZ 25/09 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against second-instance court's refusal to exempt defendant from court costs under Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number II PZ 25/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the second-instance court's decision refusing to exempt him from court costs. The appellant argued that Article 394 § 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Code allowed such appeals, but the Court clarified that this provision only covers first-instance decisions. The Court determined that cost exemption decisions are incidental rulings governed by separate bankruptcy and civil cost statutes, not final procedural decisions subject to Supreme Court review under Article 394 § 1(2).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 394 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 3941 § 1 k.p.c.: The appeal to the Supreme Court under Art. 394 § 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Code applies only to first-instance decisions; it does not cover second-instance decisions on court cost exemptions, which are incidental rulings distinct from final procedural decisions.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code court costs exemption Supreme Court appeal incidental decision bankruptcy proceedings procedural finality second instance court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 394 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3981 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 39821 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c.
art. 373 k.p.c.
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 108 k.p.c.
art. 78 Konstytucji RP
art. 176 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text