I PK 127/09
AI generated
Delegation period not counted for first step promotion pay under Judicial Act Article 91 Section 3.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Adam L.'s cassation appeal regarding his claim for a higher basic salary as an appellate judge. The court found that during his delegation to the appellate court, he did not hold an equivalent position to that of a permanently appointed appellate judge. Consequently, the time spent on delegation was excluded from the seven-year service requirement needed to reach the first step of the salary scale.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 91 § 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych; A period of delegation to a higher court does not count towards the service requirement for the first step of the salary scale if the delegate does not hold an equivalent position.
Keywords
AI generated
judicial salary scale
delegation period
equivalent position
appellate court judge
promotion requirements
basic salary step
service time calculation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 91 § 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 77 § 4 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 64 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 46 § 1 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 32 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 179 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c