Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 107/09 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling EU social security referral requires full factual establishment first.

Case Number I UK 107/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's decision to refer a question to the European Court of Justice. The Social Insurance Institution refused to issue an E-101 certificate because the employee allegedly did not reside in a Member State where he worked. The court held that a preliminary ruling request is only valid after the national court establishes all relevant facts, including the definition of 'domicile' under EU law. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the case was remanded for a new factual assessment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 ust. 2 lit. b pkt (ii) rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) Nr 1408/71; Art. 1 lit. h rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) Nr 1408/71: A request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of EU social security regulations must be preceded by the national court's full establishment of factual circumstances, including the determination of the worker's domicile, as the Court of Justice cannot assess the relevance of the legal question without these facts.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure social security coordination domicile definition factual establishment requirement E-101 certificate refusal European Court of Justice remand for new facts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 ust. 2 lit. b rozporządzenia Rady EWG nr 1408/71 z dnia 14 czerwca 1971 r.
Art. 1 lit. h rozporządzenia Rady EWG nr 1408/71 z dnia 14 czerwca 1971 r.
art. 219 k.p.a.
art. 83b ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 219 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok z dnia 11 września 2008 r., C-11/07, Hans Eckelkamp i inni v. Państwo Belgijskie
wyrok z 13 marca 2001 r., C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG v. Schleswag AG
wyrok z dnia 17 lutego 1977 r., 76/76, Di Paolo
wyrok z dnia 27 maja 1982 r., 227/81, Aubin
wyrok z dnia 13 listopada 1990 r., C-216/89, Reibold
wyrok z dnia 8 lipca 1992 r., C-216/89, Knoch

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text