Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 5/09 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal against competition fine, ruling it must be proportional to dominant position revenues.

Case Number III SK 5/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland allowed the cassation appeal regarding a competition fine imposed on a newspaper publisher. The court found that while the fine was legally justified, its amount must be proportional to the revenue generated specifically from the dominant newspaper, not total company income. Consequently, the case was remitted to the appellate court for recalculation based on this narrower revenue base.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9 ust. 1; Art. 104 ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: The administrative authority must provide reasoned justification for the amount of a competition fine, and courts reviewing the decision must assess its proportionality to the revenue derived from the specific dominant practice.

Keywords

AI generated
competition law dominant position administrative fine proportionality principle revenue base cassation appeal market dominance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9 ust. 1 of the Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers
Art. 104 ust. 1 of the Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers
Art. 8 ust. 2 of the Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers
Art. 101 ust. 1 pkt 1 of the Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers
art. 328 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 107 k.p
art. 10 k.p
art. 104 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text