Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II BU 28/08 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling application of obsolete law violated rights and justified invalidating the final judgment.

Case Number II BU 28/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the final judgment of the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk inconsistent with the law and invalid. The lower court incorrectly applied a version of the unemployment prevention law that was no longer in force on the relevant date, thereby granting a pre-retirement benefit to an applicant who did not meet the statutory requirements. The Court ruled that applying the obsolete provision constituted a flagrant violation of the applicant's rights, necessitating the annulment of the erroneous decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 42411 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 37k ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu bezrobociu: The application of a non-mandatory legal provision to a case where the applicant failed to meet statutory prerequisites constitutes a flagrant violation of law and warrants the annulment of the final judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
application of obsolete law pre-retirement benefit unemployment prevention act flagrant violation of law annulment of final judgment statutory requirements retirement age criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 42411 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 37k ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1994 r. o przeciwdziałaniu bezrobociu
art. 37k ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1994 r. o zatrudnieniu i przeciwdziałaniu bezrobociu
art. 3986 § 1 k.p.c
art. 42411 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text