Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PK 288/08 AI generated

Supreme Court allows partial appeal regarding school director dismissal damages but dismisses procedural violation claims raised ex officio.

Case Number II PK 288/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's judgment, setting aside the award for damages related to the unlawful dismissal of a school director while dismissing the appellant's procedural complaints. The appellant argued that the first-instance court failed to inform him of a specific legal interpretation, yet the appellate court had not raised this issue during the appeal. The court ruled that the second-instance judge cannot consider procedural violations ex officio unless the appeal explicitly challenges them, as the appeal focused solely on the substantive damages claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 378 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; The second-instance court, when adjudicating on appeal, is bound by the scope of the appeal and cannot consider procedural violations committed by the first-instance court ex officio unless such violations are explicitly raised in the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law appeal ex officio review procedural violation school director dismissal damages calculation scope of appeal labor code provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 45 § 2 k.p.
Art. 471 k.p.
Art. 38 ustawy z dnia 7 września 1991 r. o systemie oświaty
Art. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 378 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 15 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
§ 11 ust. 1 pkt 2 w związku z § 6 pkt 5 w związku z § 12 ust. 4 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 49/07
Appeal court bound by procedural but not material claims; voidness considered ex officio.
I PKN 342/00
Supreme Court dismissed cassation as second-instance proceedings excluded mandatory court summons under labor law. The court held that Article 477 of the Civil Procedure Code does not apply in second-instance labor cases. Consequently, the lower court could not have violated the provision, rendering the appeal inadmissible.
I PK 74/02
Supreme Court dismissed teacher's appeal, ruling school dismissal is labor law, not administrative law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text