I PK 10/09
AI generated
Cassation appeal by non-self-intervening party dismissed when principal party requests its rejection.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a non-self-intervening party who joined the proceedings on behalf of the defendant. The defendant explicitly requested the rejection of this appeal during the appellate stage, creating a clear procedural contradiction. The court ruled that such an appeal is inadmissible when the principal party opposes it, thereby preventing the intervenor from acting contrary to the party's stance.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3986 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 107 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal by a non-self-intervening party is inadmissible if the party to whom it joined requests its rejection, as the intervenor cannot act contrary to the principal party's position.
Keywords
AI generated
non-self-intervening party
cassation appeal inadmissibility
procedural contradiction
principal party opposition
costs of proceedings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3986 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 107 k.p.c.
art. 510 § 1 k.p.c
art. 76 k.p.c
art. 379 k.s.h
art. 58 § 1 k.c
art. 624 § 4 k.s.h
art. 77 k.p.c
art. 79 k.p.c
art. 81 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedUchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 25 sierpnia 1989 r., III CZP 75/89
Postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 listopada 1982 r., II CZ 121/82
Postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 maja 1998 r., I CKN 658/97
I CRN 88/96
III CZP 75/89