III BU 5/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for lack of proven damage under Art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c. due to failure to substantiate pension loss conditions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a second-instance court ruling denying a pre-retirement benefit. The applicant alleged damage caused by the judgment but failed to provide concrete evidence that all statutory conditions for the benefit were met. The court ruled that the abstract claim of loss did not satisfy the specific substantiation requirements of the relevant procedural code provision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.; Art. 2 ust. 3 ustawy o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych: A claim for damages based on a court judgment must substantiate that all material conditions for the alleged benefit were fulfilled; an abstract assertion of loss without proof of eligibility constitutes insufficient evidence of damage.
Keywords
AI generated
pre-retirement benefit
substantiation of damage
procedural code
second instance appeal
statutory conditions
evidence standard
social security law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
Art. 2 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o świadczeniach przedemerytalnych
Art. 361 § 1 k.p.
Art. 361 § 2 k.p.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 386 § 1 k.p.c
art. 361 § 1 k.p
art. 361 § 2 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CNP 4/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against enforcement clause order as it does not end main proceedings.
II CNP 13/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for non-compliance as damage must exist now, not be merely threatened in the future.
IV CNP 38/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-confirmation of loss under Art. 4245 § 1(4) CPC due to lack of proven causation.