Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling that auxiliary business activities prove continuous economic activity under social insurance law.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Krystyna G. against a lower court decision exempting her from social insurance contributions. The lower court had found that the civil company ceased economic activity in December 2001, despite the defendant performing full-time work for a partner and handling administrative tasks. The court held that performing auxiliary activities related to the business profile, even if not directly generating income, demonstrates that the economic activity had not ceased under the relevant statute.