I PK 213/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; employer's failure to record hours shifts burden of proof to employer.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding overtime pay claims. The court held that while an employee must generally prove their claims, the employer's failure to maintain time records shifts the burden of proof to the employer to disprove the hours worked. Consequently, the employee could use alternative evidence like expert opinions to establish overtime, but the court retained the right to verify these claims under general evidentiary rules.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3, 232 k.p.c.; Art. 6 k.c.; When an employer fails to maintain time records, the burden of proof shifts to the employer to disprove the employee's claims, allowing the employee to use alternative evidence subject to judicial verification.
Keywords
AI generated
burden of proof
time records
overtime pay
employer liability
evidentiary burden
labor law
cassation appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3 k.p.c.
Art. 232 k.p.c.
Art. 6 k.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
§ 12 ust. 4 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 6 k.c
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 130 § 3 k.p
art. 149 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII APa 40/02
I PKN 932/00
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling costs must be split proportionally based on final case outcome, not calculated separately for withdrawn claims.
V CSK 11/06
RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 26 kwietnia 2006 r.
V CSK 364/06
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal on insurance contract misrepresentation regarding non-factory immobilizer. The court allows the insurer's refusal based on false declaration. The court held that the non-factory immobilizer did not increase risk. The court ruled that the false declaration excludes coverage. The court found no procedural violation in the judgment. The court determined the appeal was inadmissible. The court rejected the claim for refund of costs.
I CK 176/03
II CK 62/04
I CK 178/05
Supreme Court vacates lower court dismissal, remands case to reconsider damages claim for VAT withholding breach.
I CSK 426/07
Supreme Court dismisses hospital's appeal, upholding state liability for salary increases based on statutory funding share.