Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 61/08 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed claim that same work could be performed simultaneously for two employers.

Case Number III PK 61/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against her former employer, Tadeusz S., regarding unpaid overtime and termination damages. The employee argued that she worked for the defendant, but lower courts had already established she was employed by a different entity, Przedsiębiorstwo Zagraniczne „A.-D.”, based on final judgments. The court ruled that the same factual work cannot be performed simultaneously for two employers, making it impossible to claim double compensation for the same period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 375 § 1 k.p.c.: The same factual work cannot be performed simultaneously for two employers, precluding a claim for double compensation for the same period when prior final judgments established the actual employer.

Keywords

AI generated
simultaneous employment cassation appeal final judgment binding double compensation labor law principles factual impossibility employer identification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 375 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 244 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3 k.p
art. 22 k.p
art. 22 § 11 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text