I UK 314/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where employment contract was a sham to avoid social security contributions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the appellant's social security status. The court found that the employment contract was a sham designed to pay lower social security contributions than those required for the appellant's actual business activity. Consequently, the contract was deemed invalid as it violated the principle of good faith and constituted an evasion of the law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 58 § 1 k.c.; Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 2 w zw. z art. 9 ust. 2 in fine ustawy o s.u.s.: A contract of employment concluded solely to evade higher social security contributions constitutes a legal evasion and does not grant a valid basis for mandatory social insurance coverage.
Keywords
AI generated
evasion of law
sham employment contract
social security contributions
good faith principle
mandatory insurance status
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 58 § 1 k.c.
art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 2 w zw. z art. 9 ust. 2 in fine ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 58 § 1 k.c
art. 39813 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
art. 83 k.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII UK 74/07
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling fake labor contracts with low pay violate social security principles.
III UK 75/07
Supreme Court dismisses appeal: fake forced labor contracts without half-minimum wage pay are not social insurance titles.
III UK 77/07
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding invalid agency contract used to evade social security obligations.
III UK 73/07
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on false employment contract grounds, finding minimum work requirement violated.