II PZ 1/09
AI generated
Cassation appeal dismissed because appeal value is limited to second-instance judgment scope, excluding unappealed first-instance claims.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Renata S. against the District Court's rejection of her claim. The District Court had rejected the appeal because the appeal value, calculated based on the second-instance judgment's scope, fell below the statutory threshold. The Court ruled that the appeal value cannot include claims from the initial lawsuit that were not subject to the second-instance judgment because the plaintiff failed to appeal those specific rulings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 3982 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 39813 § 1 k.p.c.: The value of the subject matter of a cassation appeal is determined by the scope of the second-instance court's decision and cannot include claims from the initial suit that were not adjudicated in the second instance.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal value
second instance scope
unappealed first instance
labor law threshold
subject matter determination
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 3982 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 39813 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 231 k.p.c.
art. 19 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3982 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39813 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3982 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 4 września 2002 r., I PZ 101/02
uchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 6 grudnia 2001 r., III ZP 28/01
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 30 stycznia 2003 r., I PK 263/02
I PK 263/02