Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 8/08 AI generated

Labor law claims can be heard by a judge and two lay judges even if some require a single judge.

Case Number I PZP 8/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a labor dispute with mixed claims could be validly heard by a single judge and two lay judges. The plaintiff sought multiple remedies, some requiring a single judge and others a mixed panel, which the lower court incorrectly split. The court ruled that the mixed panel composition remains valid for the entire case because at least one claim fits that format. Consequently, the procedural defect regarding the composition of the court for the other claims does not invalidate the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 47 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 47 § 2 pkt 1 lit. a k.p.c.; Art. 191 k.p.c.; Art. 193 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.: A labor court hearing a mixed set of claims with different required compositions may validly use a mixed panel if at least one claim falls within its jurisdiction, without rendering the proceedings void.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law claims court composition lay judges procedural validity cumulation of claims single judge panel Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 47 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 47 § 2 pkt 1 lit. a k.p.c.
Art. 191 k.p.c.
Art. 193 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 47 § 1 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 6 k.p.c
art. 47 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 119/68

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text