Supreme Court dismissed appeal; statutory appointment does not create employment relationship under Labor Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's cassation appeal regarding a dispute over reinstatement and severance pay. The plaintiff was appointed as director by the County Council but later dismissed, claiming this constituted an employment contract rather than a statutory appointment. The court held that the specific provisions for statutory appointments do not apply to this position because no explicit law mandates such a relationship for this role. Consequently, the general rule of an employment contract applies, validating the lower courts' findings of a labor relationship.