Plaintiff's claim allowed; single judge and two lay members court valid for all labor claims in one suit.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court ruled that a single judge and two lay members court is competent to hear all labor claims filed in one lawsuit, even if some claims require a different composition. The plaintiff sought multiple remedies including unpaid wages and vacation pay, which the lower court partially dismissed due to jurisdictional doubts. The court held that the legislature did not restrict cumulating claims requiring different judicial compositions, mandating the more complex panel to ensure proper adjudication of all related disputes.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 47 § 2 pkt 1a k.p.c.; Art. 191, 193 § 1 k.p.c.: When a single judge and two lay members court is competent for one claim in a labor dispute, it is also competent to hear all other claims filed in the same lawsuit, as the legislature did not exclude such cumulation.