I PZP 6/08
AI generated
Civil appeal on court costs ruling is heard by one judge under Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a first-instance ruling on court costs requires a three-judge panel or a single judge. The appellant argued that the ruling should be heard by three judges, while the Court held that the single-judge provision applies to such decisions. Consequently, the appeal was recognized by a single judge, establishing that cost-related rulings fall under the single-judge category.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 397 § 2 zdanie drugie k.p.c.; A ruling on the imposition of court costs on a party is subject to a single-judge panel under the second sentence of Article 397 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Keywords
AI generated
court costs
single judge panel
civil procedure code
legal question
appeal procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 397 § 2 zdanie drugie k.p.c.
Art. 367 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 zdanie pierwsze k.p.c.
Art. 113 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 394 § 1 pkt 1 - 12 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 1 pkt 9 k.p.c.
art. 367 § 3 k.p.c
art. 367 § 4 k.p.c
art. 394 § 1 pkt 9 k.p.c