I PK 133/08
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal dismissal due to defendant's loss of court capacity and lack of legal successor.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the lower court's decision to dismiss the appeal and remanded the case for a new ruling. The lower court had dismissed the proceedings because the insolvent defendant lost its legal capacity to act and possessed no general legal successor. The Supreme Court agreed that the loss of capacity was permanent and that the specific procedural rule regarding such dismissal took precedence over general appeal rules.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 180 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 182 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c.; Art. 182 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c. The loss of a party's court capacity without a legal successor constitutes a permanent ground for dismissing suspended proceedings, which prevails over general appeal rules.
Keywords
AI generated
loss of court capacity
legal successor
dismissal of proceedings
suspended proceedings
insolvency proceedings
procedural law
lex specialis
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 180 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 182 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c.
Art. 182 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 15 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 180 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 182 § 3 k.p.c
art. 182 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CKN 693/98
I ACa 1186/03