Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 16/08 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against fines for anti-competitive football broadcasting license agreement.

Case Number III SK 16/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Canal+ and the Polish Football Association regarding fines imposed for an anti-competitive broadcasting license agreement. The court found that the lower courts correctly established the parties acted with the intent to restrict competition on the relevant market. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as lacking valid grounds under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeals challenging the assessment of evidence or the determination of the relevant market in competition cases when the lower courts have properly established the parties' intent to restrict competition.

Keywords

AI generated
anti-competitive agreement broadcasting rights relevant market definition cassation appeal dismissal competition law fines

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 278 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 232 k.p.c
art. 217 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text