Court held that invalid association board appointment does not automatically create liability for unpaid social insurance contributions.

The Supreme Court partially allowed the cassation appeal, remanding the case for a new decision on liability for unpaid social insurance contributions. The insureds argued they were liable because their names appeared in the court registry as board members, despite the association's board being appointed in violation of the law. The court ruled that since the board appointment was invalid, the individuals could not be considered legal organs of the association, and thus the lower court failed to examine whether they actually acted without authority.