Supreme Court dismissed teacher's reinstatement claim due to severe duty breach and lack of disciplinary procedure.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal regarding her request for reinstatement after being fired without notice. The lower court found that the teacher severely violated her duties by plagiarizing colleagues' work and failing to attend meetings, yet the Supreme Court ruled that such termination requires a formal disciplinary procedure under the Teachers' Charter. Consequently, while the dismissal was deemed illegal, reinstatement was rejected as unreasonable, limiting the teacher to compensation under labor code provisions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.; Art. 6 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 76 ust. 1 pkt 3, 3a i 4 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 8 k.p.; Art. 45 ust. 1 in principio Konstytucji RP: Termination of a teacher's contract for serious breach of duties requires a disciplinary procedure; reinstatement is barred if the breach is severe and unreasonable.