Supreme Court dismissed appeal; prior settlement did not prevent labor relation reactivation by final reinstatement judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's complaint regarding a final judgment ordering the reinstatement of a worker to his job. Although the parties had previously signed a settlement agreement terminating the employment relationship, the court held that the material legal effect of the final reinstatement judgment combined with the worker's timely declaration of readiness to work reactivated the labor relationship. Consequently, the prior settlement could not negate the constitutive and declaratory nature of the reinstatement judgment, making the worker's claim for unpaid wages valid.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 48 § 1 k.p.; Art. 81 § 1 k.p.; The final judgment reinstating a worker to his job, when combined with the worker's timely declaration of readiness to work, reactivates the labor relationship regardless of any prior settlement agreement terminating the employment.