Supreme Court dismissed cassation, clarifying Art. 65 § 1 Civil Code applies to both interpreting and determining intent validity.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a lower court's award of damages for wrongful termination. The employer argued that the employee's conduct did not constitute a valid declaration of intent to withdraw the dismissal notice, citing procedural errors. The court ruled that Article 65 § 1 of the Civil Code, rather than Article 60, governs the assessment of whether specific actions amount to a declaration of intent, thereby upholding the lower court's finding that the employee's behavior was insufficient to revoke the dismissal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 60 k.c.; Art. 65 § 1 k.c.: The provision of Article 65 § 1 of the Civil Code applies to both the evaluation of the correctness of the court's interpretation of a declaration of intent and the determination of whether a specific act constitutes such a declaration.