I UZ 28/08
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's dismissal of request for written judgment reasoning due to clerical errors.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland overturned the Appeal Court's decision rejecting a request for a written judgment reasoning. The applicant's lawyer submitted a request citing an incorrect case file number and misidentified the document as a 'ruling' rather than a 'decision,' yet the court ruled this was merely a clerical error. The court held that such obvious inaccuracies do not block the procedural timeline under the Civil Procedure Code, emphasizing that rigid formalism should not hinder the administration of justice.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 zdanie pierwsze k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.: Obvious inaccuracies or clerical errors in a procedural document do not constitute an obstacle to granting it a procedural timeline.
Keywords
AI generated
clerical error
procedural timeline
written judgment reasoning
civil procedure code
formalism principle
case file number
overturned decision
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 zdanie pierwsze k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 328 § 1 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
art. 126 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 328 k.p.c
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienia z 6 czerwca 2007 r., III CZ 25/07
postanowienia z 14 stycznia 2005 r., III CZ 116/04
postanowienia z 18 lutego 2005 r., V CZ 185/04