Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 11/08 AI generated

Appeal against temporary competition decision extension initiates separate proceedings, overriding civil law dismissal.

Case Number III SK 11/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the dismissal of proceedings regarding a temporary competition decision extension. The lower courts dismissed the case because the temporary decision had lost effect, rendering the trial unnecessary under civil procedure rules. The Supreme Court ruled that filing an appeal against an extension decision triggers a distinct administrative procedure, meaning the civil trial's subject matter persisted despite the temporary decision's expiration.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 88 ust. 1 i 3 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Filing an appeal against a decision to extend the validity of a temporary competition decision initiates a separate judicial proceeding, preventing the dismissal of the case solely based on the temporary decision's subsequent loss of binding force.

Keywords

AI generated
temporary competition decision extension of validity separate judicial proceeding loss of binding force civil procedure dismissal administrative appeal competition law enforcement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 88 ust. 1 i 3 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
art. 316 k.p.c.
art. 355 k.p.c.
art. 355 k.p.c
art. 316 k.p.c
art. 355 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III SK 39/07

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text